Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds. At the same time, enthusiasm about voting next year has increased among Democrats nationwide following an unexpected win in Alabama’s Senate special election and a strong showing in Virginia’s state government elections last month. That point edge is the widest Democrats have held in CNN polling on the contests, and the largest at this point in midterm election cycles dating back two decades. The finding follows several other public polls showing large double-digit leads for Democrats on similar questions. The Democrats hold a larger lead overall now because Republicans make up a smaller share of the electorate than they did in And those Republicans who are still in the electorate are less enthusiastic about voting next year than Democrats. Read More The poll was conducted before the passage of Republicans’ signature tax reform bill this week, which the GOP hopes will boost their electoral prospects next year. Findings from the same poll released earlier this week found that the bill’s unpopularity on the rise, with few expecting tangible benefits for themselves once it becomes law.
It’s Such A Loser Move To Claim Politics Are Ruining Your Dating Life
The clock is ticking, and the pressure is fierce. Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee initially responded through a written statement that raised questions about the timing of the allegation and the motives of Democrats, who had already opposed Kavanaugh because they expect him to side with Republicans on issues such as abortion, LGBT rights, affirmative action and more. That was echoed in conservative circles.
Welcome to Republican Personals – online dating for Republicans. Join & post your profile totally free! Upload pictures!
This article is over 3 months old A man wearing a wedding ring looks at the Ashley Madison website. The study of 80, voters in five US states found that Democrats used the Ashley Madison adultery website substantially less than Republicans, Libertarians, Greens and unaffiliated voters. The results highlight an apparent paradox where those with more conservative views and supposedly stricter attitudes towards sex seem happier to hop into bed with someone outside their relationship than more liberal types.
Kodi Arfer, a behavioural scientist at the University of California in Los Angeles, and Jason Jones, a sociologist at Stony Brook University in New York, linked the voter registration records for California, Florida, Kansas, New York and Oklahoma to credit card payments made by people living in those states to Ashley Madison between and The payment details were released in when a group called the Impact Team hacked millions of Ashley Madison accounts.
Of the five states looked at in the study, California had the greatest proportion of Ashley Madison users, with one in voters holding an account. But in this state, political allegiance was only marginally linked to who signed up, with Libertarians making up one in account holders and Democrats making up about one in The rest all fell in between.
But the state, which has backed a Republican in every presidential election since , boasted the greatest political split in users, with fewer than one in 1, Democrats holding an Ashley Madison account compared with one in Republicans. Across the board, Libertarians made up the greatest proportion of Ashley Madison clients. Life after the Ashley Madison affair Read more The study does not shed light on why Republicans might be more likely to have affairs than Democrats, but Arfer has a couple of theories.
The first is that, thanks to more restricted sex education and discussion, right-leaning people may be less well-informed about sex and sexuality, and so have poorer sexual self-control. The second is that people who are more interested in taboo activities declare themselves Republicans, and profess to have stricter attitudes, to deflect suspicion. But another explanation is possible.
Survey Report The partisan divide in Middle East sympathies, for Israel or the Palestinians, is now wider than at any point since The latest national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted Jan. About half of Americans say a two-state solution is possible in the Middle East: But the partisan divide has widened considerably, especially over the past two decades.
The share of Republicans who sympathize with Israel has never been higher, dating back four decades.
About Republican Dating Welcome to , a focused online dating service dedicated to conservative singles. Shared views are an important foundation to any relationship. RepublicanPeopleMeet understands this and is designed to bring single Republican men and single Republican women together. Whether you are looking for a.
How Americans View Their Government 1. Fewer than three-in-ten Americans have expressed trust in the federal government in every major national poll conducted since July — the longest period of low trust in government in more than 50 years. The erosion of public trust in government began in the s. By the end of the s, only about a quarter of Americans felt that they could trust the government at least most of the time. Trust in government rebounded in the s before falling in the early to mid s.
But as the economy boomed in the late s, confidence in government increased. But the rise in government trust was short-lived — by the summer of , the share saying they could trust the government had tumbled 22 percentage points. Amid the war in Iraq and economic uncertainty at home, trust in government continued to decline. Since Barack Obama took office in , higher shares of Democrats than Republicans have expressed trust in government.
Since the s, trust in government has been consistently higher among members of the party that controls the White House than among the opposition party. However, Republicans are much more reactive than Democrats to changes in political power. During the eight years of George W. Average trust among Democrats, by contrast, has remained more stable throughout the George W.
Bush and Obama years.
Caitlyn Jenner Tells GOP Gathering Why She’s a Republican
I more afrazte34 Minneapolis, MN I’m a nice guy with nice personality no drama no arguing laid back out going people person very honest and respectful towards more Tracy Minneapolis, MN I’m flexible, ambitious, obedient, amiable, good- natured, punctual, humane, Thanks for the visit! You can contact with me h more Minneapolis, MN Let’s go see a movie, chat, have a drink.
See where it goes. Here’s where you can meet singles in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
What is the Russia-Clinton uranium deal? What’s the latest on a controversial uranium deal with Russia that was brokered during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State? First came reports that the FBI knew about a Russian bribery plot tied to nuclear energy interests in the U. Meanwhile, Fusion GPS, the firm behind the controversial anti-Trump dossier, has gone to court to block Congress from getting its bank records after its representatives pleaded the Fifth in a Capitol Hill appearance last week.
But Republicans beg to differ. Tony Podesta’s firm is facing scrutiny from the Robert Mueller probe. Several Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill are now asking questions about how the deal was approved the next year by an inter-agency committee. The spy was later arrested. But, according to documents reviewed by Fox News, Fusion is seeking a “temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction” to block the release of those records. Fusion’s filing in the U.
District Court for the District of Columbia claimed that complying with the subpoena would “deny Plaintiff and its clients their rights to free speech and expressive association as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution. Fusion has refused to tell congressional committees who paid for the dossier or reveal its sources. Two top officials from the political research firm invoked their Fifth Amendment right and refused to answer questions last Wednesday before the same House panel.
US Politics Forum
Republicans offer Hispanics hope and have earned our votes November 9, No Comments A polling location station is ready for the election day. As lieutenant governor of New Mexico, I have had the privilege of living and serving in a state with over 50 percent minority residents. I was born and raised in Albuquerque, New Mexico and was the youngest of eight children.
A Pew Research study shows that 20 years ago, 17 percent of Republicans had a “very unfavorable” view of Democrats. Now it’s 43 percent. only to have me decline because of my Dating.
At the start of the year, Republicans promised to reverse the near percent rise in the capital-gains tax under President Barack Obama — a hike that helped bring investment rates to historic lows. That repeal never happened. But now the Senate tax reform proposes to raise several billion over the next decade by changing the rules on how stocks are taxed.
It would require shareholders to sell their oldest shares in a company before their newest purchased ones. The older the share, the larger the taxable capital gain. This is called the first-in-first-out accounting system. Now this accounting change may actually make sense, except that the gains on long-term stocks are not adjusted for inflation. The actual capital-gains tax paid could more than double for many stock and asset sales.
So the Senate rules will require millions of Americans to pay taxes on phantom or illusory gains. That is patently unfair and will discourage the very long-term investment that economists and politicians agree that we need. But the government thinks you have. There are other huge inequities in this new policy. They would continue to apply the current law tax treatment.
Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government
If there’s one thing you can be sure of, it’s that in a few months, you’ll be overwhelmed by news stories with headlines like these: How can we live without advice columns calming the turgid panic surrounding the American political mating rituals? They’re all about hand-wringing over dangerous liaisons between men and women who find themselves ideologically opposed.
October 4, The Politics of Climate Polarized views about climate issues stretch from the causes and cures for climate change to trust in climate scientists and their research. There are also major divides in the way partisans interpret the current scientific discussion over climate, with the political left and right having vastly divergent perceptions of modern scientific consensus, differing levels of trust in the information they get from professional researchers, and different views as to whether it is the quest for knowledge or the quest for professional advancement that drives climate scientists in their work.
When it comes to party divides, the biggest gaps on climate policy and climate science are between those at the ends of the political spectrum. Across the board, from possible causes to who should be the one to sort this all out, liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans see climate-related matters through vastly different lenses.
Perhaps it follows, then, that liberal Democrats are much more inclined to believe a wide variety of environmental catastrophes are potentially headed our way, and that both policy and individual actions can be effective in heading some of these off. And, a majority of conservative Republicans believe that each of the six actions to address climate change can make no more than a small difference.
Democrats are especially likely to see scientists and their research in a positive light. Few in either party say climate scientists should have no role in policy decisions. To the extent there are political differences among Americans on these issues, those variances are largely concentrated when it comes to their views about climate scientists, per se, rather than scientists, generally. Majorities of all political groups report a fair amount of confidence in scientists, overall, to act in the public interest.
And to the extent that Republicans are personally concerned about climate issues, they tend to hold more positive views about climate research. Liberal Democrats are especially inclined to believe harms from climate change are likely and that both policy and individual actions can be effective in addressing climate change. Among the political divides over which actions could make a difference in addressing climate change: The stakes in climate debates seem particularly high to liberal Democrats because they are especially likely to believe that climate change will bring harms to the environment.
Republicans Are Losing Female Lawmakers ― That’s Bad for Democrats, Too
Democrats were most surprised by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio’s vote against reauthorizing the law, which still passed the Senate by a wide margin. Rand Paul and South Dakota Sen. John Thune, both eyeing the White House, also voted against the bill. Advertisement Reauthorization of the law, first passed in , now heads to the House, where swift passage is far from guaranteed. House Republicans killed the legislation last year, though Democrats have now dropped some of the provisions that drew GOP objections, including expanded visas for abused immigrants.
The ruling oligarchy has truly divided and conquered on the heels of ignorance. Larry Berry I like Tom Selleck. The republican party would do well to put HIM front and center instead of nugent, trump, etc. Instead they pat the nuge on the back, thank him for his support and let him be the celebrity face of the gop and nra. Instead they pander for the trump endorsement. Selleck is the old school Reagan style gop. Looks like people on the left have their own freedom of speech as long as it agrees with their thoughts Please respond there Larry if you dare.
Growth has sped up. Faced with strong Democratic enthusiasm and fund-raising, and hindered by an unpopular president, Republicans were counting on that economic strength to lift them at the polls, or at least limit the damage. Republicans lost in House districts with low unemployment rates. They lost in districts that have gained manufacturing jobs.
They lost in districts that got big tax cuts.
Yes, this is really a list of dating questions. Although I was shocked to find there are some Republicans in Brooklyn (OK, there was one), the entire experience felt profoundly off-putting.
US Congress US House of Representatives The tweet is in line with a familiar refrain from Trump’s recent campaign rallies and even dating back to his debates during the Republican primary. However, it’s not consistent with his administration’s actions and policies. Earlier this month, a Democratic measure aimed at eliminating short-term health care plans that don’t have to cover pre-existing conditions failed in the Senate.
Susan Collins was the sole Republican to vote for the measure. The resolution was aimed at rebuffing a Trump executive order unveiled in August that made it easier to buy these plans. Short-term health care plans don’t have to adhere to the Affordable Care Act’s regulations that protect people with pre-existing conditions. These plans can deny coverage or charge higher premiums to Americans based on their medical histories.
And they don’t have to provide comprehensive coverage. The Trump administration made it easier to buy these plans — allowing people to buy coverage for just under a year, versus the day limit imposed by the Obama administration. The administration also broadened the availability of plans that small businesses can buy that don’t have to adhere to all of Obamacare’s protections. Additionally, the administration sought to gut two core provisions of the Affordable Care Act that guarantee protections for those with pre-existing conditions in June.
The White House supported several Obamacare repeal bills, including one in the House of Representatives that advocates argued weakened coverage of pre-existing conditions. Several moderate Republicans in the House of Representatives even cited a lack of protections for people with pre-existing conditions as a reason they voted “no.